After a week of “confessional” meetings between aides to summit chairman Donald Tusk and envoys from other member states, which should conclude on Monday, people involved told Reuters many opposed demands Prime Minister David Cameronlaid out in a letter to Tusk two weeks ago.
Cameron has set an end-2017 deadline for a referendum on EU membership. In order to stay in, he says, London needs changes. The longer such negotiations with EU partners take and the more divided they become, the greater the risk he will fail to deliver such reforms.
One proposal many leaders object to is that immigrants from EU states should wait four years before receiving in-work benefits such as tax credits and support for children living abroad. Officials and diplomats see that as discriminating between EU citizens on national grounds, which they say jars with basic EU treaty law.
“The situation is between difficult and very difficult,” one official said late last week, after more than 20 of the 27 other member states had had their meeting with staff working for Tusk, the European Council president whose job it is to forge compromise among the members of the European Union.
The one-to-one meetings, a standard EU procedure, are intended to frame negotiations and there had been some hope in recent months that at least the bulk of a deal might be ready for the Council to endorse at its next meeting on Dec. 17-18.
But the official said it was hard to imagine that a deal would be reached at that summit and that even constructive discussions were not a certainty: “Many countries say they want more Europe, not less Europe. And Cameron wants less Europe.
“There is no agreement on individual issues like the four years and no one will agree to discrimination.”
A spokesman for the British government said: “We’ve always been clear that what matters is addressing the concerns of the British people. We’ll be driven by substance not speed.
“The prime minister looks forward to a substantive discussion on the UK renegotiation at the December European Council.”
Cameron will have to work hard in the coming weeks to sway EU leaders to achieve a successful outcome to negotiations.
Other EU leaders see him as failing to show solidarity on matters such as the influx of refugees to Europe and the euro zone crisis.
Earlier this month, the EU’s executive divided Cameron’s demands for reform into three categories: the feasible, the difficult and the “highly problematic”. The last refers particularly to curbing benefits for workers from other EU states.
Such curbs are a particular dislike of ex-communist eastern states like Tusk’s fellow Poles, not just because many of their citizens work in the wealthier west but also because it is a touchstone of their emergence from Soviet control.
One EU diplomat said that, while most want to see Britain, the EU’s second biggest economy, remain in the bloc, its demands posed complex problems.
In addition, the attacks on Paris, the conflict in Syria and with Islamic State, plus the refugee crisis, will leave leaders with little time to negotiate with Cameron over the next month, the diplomat said.
Cameron’s other demands include that EU law be amended to make clear that the bloc could not impose decisions on the non-euro members like Britain. He has also called for cutting EU red tape and to help the free flow of capital, goods and services.
“What is clear,” another EU official said, “is that there is flexibility and constructive attitudes from EU member states; everybody clearly expresses that they want to keep Britain in the EU and they are willing to be flexible.
“But at the same time, everybody recognises that it will be very difficult, that a number of the British demands are inherently difficult, including the one on social benefits.
“Hopefully, Britain will also be flexible.”